Jump to content

Primary: Sky Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Secondary: Sky Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Pattern: Blank Waves Squares Notes Sharp Wood Rockface Leather Honey Vertical Triangles
* * * * - (4.2 - 128votes)

Peter Grill to Kenja no Jikan


Alt Names: alt ピーター・グリルと賢者の時間alt Peter Grill and the Philosopher's Timealt Peter Grill and the Sage Time
Author: Hiyama Daisuke
Artist: Hiyama Daisuke
Genres: Adventure AdventureComedy ComedyEcchi EcchiFantasy FantasyHarem HaremRomance RomanceSeinen Seinen
Type: Manga (Japanese)
Status: Ongoing
Description: Peter Grill is known throughout the land as the world's strongest fighter. He has a girlfriend who he's steadily trying to get closer with. Life is good for him.

Until he realizes that dozens of women, who want to bear strong children, are all vying for his seed.
Go to Peter Grill to Kenja no Jikan Forums! | Scroll Down to Comments
The following content is intended for mature audiences and may contain sexual themes, gore, violence and/or strong language. Discretion is advised.


Latest Forum Posts

Topic Started By Stats Last Post Info
Topic Raws New Window garismaatti
  • 0 Replies
  • 196 Views

Chapters

Title Group Contributor Date
Vol.1 Ch.3 Read Online
LHTranslation .Chickens 3 days ago
x

Register now for full access! You'll be able to follow (bookmark) your favorites, get updates on new releases, and more! It's completely free and only takes a minute.



128 Comments

Read first chapter. Instant follow.

Seriously, they need to change the title to another name..

Well, that was I thought before..

Now I know why they named it like that..

Polygyny and gay marriage are not comparable issues

Lesbians and gay men tend to extract themselves from the genepool over time since they aren't interested in the opposite side to begin with

it isn't a case of having a father it's about parental access, and passive maintenance of social equality and resilience, we could even bring in an argument that at it's most fundamental level as found in other species it's about genetic diversity and gradual pedigree collapse and provision of mutation and recombination events and the possibility of one male to spread dangerous mutations disproportionately, the same problems as wider use of sperm banks has been see to have....(my thoughts are influenced by the wider consequences of certain livestock reproductive technologies and their effect of simplifying their respective genepools where we're looking at ratios of 100,000+ offspring per bull/boar which leads eventually to a hollowed out gene pool and loss of localised adaptations and variation for some breeds this has actually become a pretty problematic issue).

I tend to argue from extremes but I felt it was the only way to consider the deeper issues, as mentioned before it exists in some form informally but that's not a reason to legalise it, thanks for keeping this longwinded overblown war of words civil.

I have to agree with you there, when a problem has enough weight to it enough the extremes need to be considered before you can move down the ladder, and Same to you, I find it increasingly hard to find people who can end on a civil note, granted, I do enjoy trash talk when the other party can use it casually.

That is a very extreme view of things in my opinion, and there have always been large amounts of unrest whenever something new is introduced, gay marriage is once again a good example of that particular problem, and the majority of women wouldn't even go for a polygamous relationship, and by that logic a lesbian couple wouldn't be capable of raising their children with the correct amount of love and attention because they don't have a "father"

 

There are a lot of things that need to happen and a lot of people are going to experience misfortune because of it, inventing and implementing cheaper ways to desalinate water and cleaner more efficient ways to generate energy will cause just as much backlash if not more, not all change is bad despite the unrest it will cause everyone.

 

I don't think we'll find a middle ground with our beliefs, though, I did enjoy the debate despite all the space it took up in the comment section :P

Polygyny and gay marriage are not comparable issues

Lesbians and gay men tend to extract themselves from the genepool over time since they aren't interested in the opposite side to begin with

it isn't a case of having a father it's about parental access, and passive maintenance of social equality and resilience, we could even bring in an argument that at it's most fundamental level as found in other species it's about genetic diversity and gradual pedigree collapse and provision of mutation and recombination events and the possibility of one male to spread dangerous mutations disproportionately, the same problems as wider use of sperm banks has been see to have....(my thoughts are influenced by the wider consequences of certain livestock reproductive technologies and their effect of simplifying their respective genepools where we're looking at ratios of 100,000+ offspring per bull/boar which leads eventually to a hollowed out gene pool and loss of localised adaptations and variation for some breeds this has actually become a pretty problematic issue).

I tend to argue from extremes but I felt it was the only way to consider the deeper issues, as mentioned before it exists in some form informally but that's not a reason to legalise it, thanks for keeping this longwinded overblown war of words civil.

What some people would prefer and what is best for the welfare of the residents of a nation are two entirely different things

Legalising polygyny in a nation where the number of males reaching maturity is naturally higher than females due to the birth ratio and better male survival to adulthood will only create division and exacerbate social issues.

Angry disenfranchised young men without access to women or the opportunity to have children, start wars. these are fundamentals,

Modern states care about the quality of child and subsequent adult citizen that can be produced under high educational cost conditions, the greater the level of loving care and attention available for each child the better, splitting the father 2 or 3 ways leads to worse outcomes.

it already exists informally through mistresses or serially monogamous marriages and divorce.

That is a very extreme view of things in my opinion, and there have always been large amounts of unrest whenever something new is introduced, gay marriage is once again a good example of that particular problem, and the majority of women wouldn't even go for a polygamous relationship, and by that logic a lesbian couple wouldn't be capable of raising their children with the correct amount of love and attention because they don't have a "father"

 

There are a lot of things that need to happen and a lot of people are going to experience misfortune because of it, inventing and implementing cheaper ways to desalinate water and cleaner more efficient ways to generate energy will cause just as much backlash if not more, not all change is bad despite the unrest it will cause everyone.

 

I don't think we'll find a middle ground with our beliefs, though, I did enjoy the debate despite all the space it took up in the comment section :P

I think we were just on two different topics from the get-go, I was talking about making polygamy legal in the states and other 1st world countries for people that would prefer polygamous relationships over monogamous ones, and you seemed to be discussing the logic of it existing in a community where survival isn't really an issue anymore.

 

I think someone from LH said something about their primary guy not being available for some reason, I think they'll probably clean them up at the end of December, although I might be wrong, my memory can be pretty shit at times.

What some people would prefer and what is best for the welfare of the residents of a nation are two entirely different things

Legalising polygyny in a nation where the number of males reaching maturity is naturally higher than females due to the birth ratio and better male survival to adulthood will only create division and exacerbate social issues.

Angry disenfranchised young men without access to women or the opportunity to have children, start wars. these are fundamentals,

Modern states care about the quality of child and subsequent adult citizen that can be produced under high educational cost conditions, the greater the level of loving care and attention available for each child the better, splitting the father 2 or 3 ways leads to worse outcomes.

it already exists informally through mistresses or serially monogamous marriages and divorce.

Reminds me of the H-anime Elven Bride.

I think we should drop this discussion already since a more pressing matter is the sudden drop in quality of this series' translations and typesetting descending to similar levels as LH's other series. there are enough errors in ch03 to make us quite worried about the accuracy

(this post is a mess, I'll have to fix it later)

 

it ain't about small selfish standards it's a difference of environment and the factors the determine survival of males

polygamy is common in less developed countries or areas where mortality of men is higher, or where there are wide levels of inequality, or warm areas with  high levels of disease and parasites disease is rife, complex developed colder countries have much higher male survival and as such the potential for conflict over mates coupled with the shear costs of raising just two children to the academic standards required by these cultures differ greatly from less developed more agricultural areas where more children mean more family labour

 

 

reverse reply to BCS: Except chimps are more promiscuous rather than polygynous, females will mate with multiple males as a way of preventing rival males killing infants if you think the baby might be yours you don't kill it, gorillas are polygynous and defend a harem of females, their prodigious strength and violence orientated body attest to the shear lethality of silverback, combat, and the infanticide at regime change to hurry mothers back into cycle

your ideas of polygyny seem to be based on tropical or sub tropical primates instead of temperate or colder regions where different dynamics and factors of survival are at play.

I think we were just on two different topics from the get-go, I was talking about making polygamy legal in the states and other 1st world countries for people that would prefer polygamous relationships over monogamous ones, and you seemed to be discussing the logic of it existing in a community where survival isn't really an issue anymore.

 

I think someone from LH said something about their primary guy not being available for some reason, I think they'll probably clean them up at the end of December, although I might be wrong, my memory can be pretty shit at times.

FYI, subliminal, polygamy is not common in any country. It's basically only limited to primitive tribes still existing today, like the aborigines. And these guys don't form countries for obvious reasons.

Polygyny stops and monogamy begins when agriculture appears. That's almost an universal constant, both across time(history) and space(everywhere) And it is because it takes the "artificial" invention of agriculture for monogamy to appear, that I'm a staunch supporter of the theory that humans are biologically wired for polygyny, since that's what they(and all of our closest relatives, like chimpanzees) practice in their "natural environment".

I think we should drop this discussion already since a more pressing matter is the sudden drop in quality of this series' translations and typesetting descending to similar levels as LH's other series. there are enough errors in ch03 to make us quite worried about the accuracy

(this post is a mess, I'll have to fix it later)

 

 

You do realize it would be a personal freedom, I mean, it's not like they would enforce polygamy on people in 1st world countries, and since it's so vehemently rejected by the majority, why would making it possible for people with the means be an issue?
 
It seems like a very selfish standard to impose on such a small minority.

 

it ain't about small selfish standards it's a difference of environment and the factors the determine survival of males

polygamy is common in less developed countries or areas where mortality of men is higher, or where there are wide levels of inequality, or warm areas with  high levels of disease and parasites disease is rife, complex developed colder countries have much higher male survival and as such the potential for conflict over mates coupled with the shear costs of raising just two children to the academic standards required by these cultures differ greatly from less developed more agricultural areas where more children mean more family labour

 

 

reverse reply to BCS: Except chimps are more promiscuous rather than polygynous, females will mate with multiple males as a way of preventing rival males killing infants if you think the baby might be yours you don't kill it, gorillas are polygynous and defend a harem of females, their prodigious strength and violence orientated body attest to the shear lethality of silverback, combat, and the infanticide at regime change to hurry mothers back into cycle

your ideas of polygyny seem to be based on tropical or sub tropical primates instead of temperate or colder regions where different dynamics and factors of survival are at play.

I like me some lolis, but I was under this impression as well...

 

... poor girl seems like had her head transplanted into a boy's body.

 

Spoiler

How many do you need?

The simple economics argument is a pretty strong one. Polygamy/Polyamory and Inequality are intrinsically linked.

You do realize it would be a personal freedom, I mean, it's not like they would enforce polygamy on people in 1st world countries, and since it's so vehemently rejected by the majority, why would making it possible for people with the means be an issue?
 
It seems like a very selfish standard to impose on such a small minority.

Take years of hard work from the group to raise a kid until he is self-sufficient.


I fixed your quote, I hope now you can see where you went wrong in your reasoning.
 

How many do you need?


You're yet to deliver any at all, so...

Spoiler

GOMU GOMU NO GATLING FINGER POINT

surely you mean ATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATA?

E0L7USs.png

GOMU GOMU NO GATLING FINGER POINT

that was a saddest loli body i've ever seen. that shoulder and chest are so wide it makes my scrawny and skinny body belongs to a trap. poor girl seems like had her head transplanted into a boy's body.

[citation needed]

How many do you need?

The simple economics argument is a pretty strong one. Polygamy/Polyamory and Inequality are intrinsically linked.

Marriage is the societal construct, not monogamy, which is a biological imperative (one of several). 

polygamous societies create deep seated resentment and are associated with the most brutal and barbaric cultures they only ever work in times of necessity when men have been killed off by war or dangerous work, in periods of peace you just create asymmetry, restless young men and poorly raised children.

[citation needed]

polygamous societies create deep seated resentment and are associated with the most brutal and barbaric cultures they only ever work in times of necessity when men have been killed off by war or dangerous work, in periods of peace you just create asymmetry, restless young men and poorly raised children.

People who are going to develop a deep-seated resentment towards families simply because of their relationship and/or lifestyle, aren't worth listening to in the first place and need to be given Darwin awards for the future of humanity, I also remember similar "studies" regarding gay parents raising children, imagine that.

 

Just live and let live buddy, if you can't accomplish that, then at least try not to burden future generations with that baggage.

I'm agnostic, so I accept all possibilities until "sufficiently proven" otherwise, it's the atheists who have the "anti-magic" boner, and I was referring to the result of said indoctrination, meaning now in modern times, and how there are and have been some successful polygamous relationships outside of the majority, we don't need to worry about a few stillbirths jeopardizing the whole community anymore, if some people want multiple lovers, then that is their prerogative, and we have no right to deny them that.

polygamous societies create deep seated resentment and are associated with the most brutal and barbaric cultures they only ever work in times of necessity when men have been killed off by war or dangerous work, in periods of peace you just create asymmetry, restless young men and poorly raised children.

Humsn females can die with each chilbirth. Human children are fragile as they can be. Take years of hard work from both parents to raise a kid until he is self-sufficient. "Monogamy is just indoctrination, lol". I don't get how people accept evolution and then believe in this crap. Let me spell it for you: Evolution works also for societies. We're monogamous because every other system is worse.

I'm agnostic, so I accept all possibilities until "sufficiently proven" otherwise, it's atheists who have the "anti-magic" boner, and I was referring to the result of said indoctrination, meaning now in modern times, and how there are and have been some successful polygamous relationships outside of the majority, we don't need to worry about a few stillbirths jeopardizing the whole community anymore, if some people want multiple lovers, then that is their prerogative, and we have no right to deny them that.

What bad luck! Getting a flat Elf.

our societies indoctrination into monogamy, the majority of people reject the mere idea of a genuine polygamous relationship.
 


Humsn females can die with each chilbirth.
Human children are fragile as they can be.
Take years of hard work from both parents to raise a kid until he is self-sufficient.

"Monogamy is just indoctrination, lol".

I don't get how people accept evolution and then believe in this crap. Let me spell it for you: Evolution works also for societies. We're monogamous because every other system is worse.

Search Comics